Re: Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get
>>> this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat
>>> continues to push out updates even. E.g.
>>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html
>>>
>>
>> that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before.
>>
>> what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat
>> where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not
>> completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that
>> might be ?
>>
>> regards
>>
>> - --
>> Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project
> 
> 
> I suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin.
> 
> Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary.
> 

It is indeed not completely open source.  I was told that the agreement
between Red Hat and Google only allows the RPMs for RHEL to be released
to subscribers on the supplemental channel.

Sorry, but I can't release it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux