Re: libdrm info wrong when build with mock - test solution??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 18:21 +0200, Andreas Benzler wrote:
> Hello guys...
> 
> I compiled inside of "mock"
> 
> libdrm 2.67
> mesa 11.2.1
> ati 7.6.1
> 
> mockbuild says:
> 
> libdrm x86_64 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos local-drivers - OK
> 
> mesa-libGL-devel x86_64 11.1.2-1.20160210.el7.centos local-mesa - OK
> 
> installed packaged:
> 
> xorg-x11-drv-ati.x86_64              7.6.1-1.el7.centos
> @local-drivers OK
> 
> libdrm.x86_64
> 2.4.67-1.20160218gitadd8936.el7.centos OK
> 
> glxinfo says:
> 
> OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD JUNIPER (DRM 2.43.0, LLVM
> 3.6.2)
> OpenGL core profile version string: 3.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 3.30
> OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30
> OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.0 Mesa 11.1.2
> OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES
> 3.00
> 
> DRM 2.43.0 ??
> 
> Wired...
> 

These are not versions in CentOS (not supported). What is the source of
these SRPMs?

Regards

Phil

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux