On 03/09/16 15:33, John R Pierce wrote: <<<>>> > A minor(?) downside of too many unneeded packages is how much time yum > update takes. > -- very true. except i do now believe that most of what i took out is what i put back when i installed wine 32 bit. :-D -- peace out. If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes... ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it! -+- in a world with out fences, who needs gates. CentOS GNU/Linux 6.7 tc,hago. g . _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
- From: g <geleem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:11:22 -0600
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <56E096C1.8060007@hogranch.com>
- Organization: hp.lan.argos.lab
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
- References:
- 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
- From: g
- Re: 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
- From: Gordon Messmer
- Re: 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
- From: John R Pierce
- 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
- Prev by Date: Re: 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] security bug with firefox and add-on
- Previous by thread: Re: 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
- Next by thread: Re: 32 bit programs and libraries on a 64 bit architecture
- Index(es):
 |