Re: OpenSSL Update - not a security update???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I understand that some people might be trying to cherry-pick their 
updates and the assertion that doing so is not supported.  But that is 
not the only way in which --security can be used and it is a bit boring 
to continually see whining about the assumptive use.

For me it is about scheduling -- it would answer the question: Does this 
system need updating immediately, vs scheduled for / deferred until a 
convenient time.

I wish --security was functional and I do not accept that because it can 
be abused that it should therefore never be.  That CentOS as yet has no 
way to make it functional is sad, and I hope that the lack is not due to 
the assumed use resulting in it being ignored.


/mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux