On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:33:49PM +0000, Always Learning wrote:
> Is systemd the beneficial, reliable, useful and workable "improved init
> system" or something with circa 275,000 lines of coding compared to
> init's circa 10,000 lines ? Things I have learned in programming
> include modular is better than monolithic, and less code better than
> M$-style bloatware which systemd appears to be.
This is a typical comment which clearly indicates very little actual
knowledge of systemd. There's really not much to say other than that.
> Just what is Fedora's and Red Hat's Plan B when the revolt against
> systemd escalates ? Whom is going to apologise for fouling-up Red
> Hat's EL and our beloved Centos ?
Well, that's certainly dramatic.
But the answer is simple: show us the code. If it "escalates" to the
point where we have better options, that's a huge win for everyone.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
