On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Peter Duffy wrote:
No one is saying that sysvinit is perfect. What I can't grasp is why replace it with something which is no less imperfect, and is almost certainly worse in at least some respects - and to make that replacement unavoidable and mandatory.
Distros weighed up the advantages and disadvantages, and made a decision as to what they thought was best. They even shared their reasoning.
I'm also still trying to figure out in what way systemd is supposed to be "better".
https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd#Why_Debian_should_default_to_systemd jh _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
