On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 19:04 +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote: > > > Op 23 dec. 2015 om 18:31 heeft Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicag > > o.edu> het volgende geschreven: > > > > > > > > > > > If I understand IP networking correctly, you only can have > > "aliases" of > > the interface appear on the _same_ network segment (I'm tempted to > > say > > same class C network) as the main IP of interface, say you have: > > > > DEVICE=eth0 > > IPADDR=x.y.z.w > > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > > GATEWAY=x.y.z.254 > > > > Then with the restriction I mentioned you can have alias: > > > > DEVICE=eth0:0 > > IPADDR=x.y.z.a > > NETMASK=255.255.255.255 > > > > Note that "x.y.z." part is the same in both IPs. > > > > Somebody may correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > Valeri > > > > > > > > > I have used an 10. Alias on a 192. Interface so it is possible > Patrick I believe you are right. A netmask of 255.255.255.255 however seems wrong. With that netmask a broadcast for address resolution will not work... Louis _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos