Maybe or maybe not.
Redhat support policy is a bit intresting..
--
Eero
2015-12-10 17:47 GMT+02:00 Noam Bernstein <noam.bernstein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Dec 10, 2015, at 10:40 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 10.12.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Noam Bernstein <
> noam.bernstein@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> I guess this is really a RedHat, not CentOS question, but I’m hoping
> that someone here will be familiar enough with the upstream policy to have
> some useful information.
> >>
> >> How does RedHat decide which versions to release patches for, e.g.
> https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7613 <
> https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7613> which has only a
> RH7 erratum, not 6? And are they likely to eventually release a fix for
> this type of issue for RH6?
> >
> > Generally defined by the production phases:
> > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
> >
> > It explains not all but at least the big picture …
>
> That’s useful, thanks.
>
> It does seem to indicate that RH6 is still in production 1, with security
> and bug fix errata being released. So does that mean that I can expect RH
> to eventually release a fix for this CVE, but they just haven’t gotten
> around to it yet?
>
>
> Noam
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Noam Bernstein
> Center for Materials Physics and Technology
> Naval Research Laboratory Code 6390
>
> noam.bernstein@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> phone: 202 404 8628
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
