On 12/09/2015 09:37 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hundreds of contributors introduces something that in my opinion may
impact a server installation. ....
Am I correct?
Yeah, pretty much. At least you have the ability to have some input
upstream, unlike with Windows.
Once it is in RHEL, it is simply *going* to be in CentOS, full stop. If
you don't want it in CentOS, then it needs to be yelled about when it
appears in Fedora. Yes, this is work. But many are already doing this
work; it is those people whose voices are being heard; it is also some
of those people that are making dynamic networking happen (which is
useful for more than just laptops).
Hi,
I think saying that you can have some say as to what goes into Fedora is being a little
naive, look at systemd, many people complained about its inclusion but the powers to be
heard none of it, and the refrain I saw was if you don't like systemd then run something else.
Regards,
Steve
If you want your voice to be heard, you have to use your voice in the
venue where changes can happen. Once it is in a particular major
version of CentOS, it is simply not going away (unless RHEL removes it).
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.clark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.netwolves.com
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
