On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:37:33AM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> >So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
> >that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
> >developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
> >hundreds of contributors introduces something that in my opinion may
> >impact a server installation. ....
>
> If you want your voice to be heard, you have to use your voice in
> the venue where changes can happen. Once it is in a particular
> major version of CentOS, it is simply not going away (unless RHEL
> removes it).
>
The best place to keep track is probably the Fedora testing list. Adam
Williamson, among others, does listen to reasonable disagreements and some
decisions that would be bad for a server O/S do get turned down.
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
