Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 03.12.2015 um 15:40 schrieb m.roth@xxxxxxxxx:
>> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, December 3, 2015 4:28 am, Leon Fauster wrote:
>>>> Am 03.12.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Greg Lindahl <lindahl@xxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>> CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') not yet released ...
>>>
>>> aka 7.2, huh? auka 7.2 would be more appropriate IMHO (by auka meaning
>>> Also UnKnown As). Seriously, the scheme is awfully obscure. Our
>>> proficiemcy becomes aking the one of MS Windows admins: you just need
>>> to learn new names or locations of yet the same tools.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I forgot to pus sarcasm tags...
>>>
>> Agreed. I don't want "hints", and I'm not doing fedora or ubuntu,
>> because I don't want the LATESTGREATESTBLEEDINGEDGETIP, I want
>> *stability*, and, since we're supposed to be *enterprise* grade,
>> I want stuff that's simple enough for a poor ol' sysadmin, who
>> might have to explain to a manager what we're on....
>
> well - for CentOS there is only one state where you should be - on the
> "latest".
Sorry, you seem to not have dealt with enough managers who only really
know Windows, or other divisions (esp. ones that are 95% Windows) who
require documentation, etc....
I can live with the x.y.yymm, but not showing the relation to upstream is
annoying.
mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
