On 11/20/2015 09:11 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
And indeed it did. Not to the extent of going ultimately against my scheme. OK, CentOS (7) just fell yet one more notch down in my opinion. Thanks for correcting me.
Have a look at the links I sent earlier and see if that approach might work for you. If not, I'd be interested in what needs it doesn't meet.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos