Re: firewalld being stupid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Em 17-11-2015 01:26, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn escreveu:
On 16.11.2015 22:58, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 11/16/2015 01:39 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
This is very frustrating, and not obvious. If --permanent doesn't work
for a command, then it should give an error - not silently fail
without doing anything!

But --permanent *did* work.

What you're seeing is the documented behavior:
        --permanent
            The permanent option --permanent can be used to set options
            permanently. These changes are not effective immediately, only
            after service restart/reload or system reboot. Without the
            --permanent option, a change will only be part of the runtime
            configuration.

            If you want to make a change in runtime and permanent
            configuration, use the same call with and without the
--permanent
            option.

That's fairly annoying behavior as it creates the potential for
accidentally diverging configurations.
Why not do the same as virsh an have two options for this? When I attach
a device I can specify --config to update the persistent configuration,
--live to update the runtime configuration and both if I want to change
both. That's a much better API in my opinion.

It's the same thing but with different names and a default, --config.
And I agree, it would be nice to be able to issue both options at once.
Would you open a BZ asking for this or should I?

  Marcelo

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux