Re: Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

[Mark Milhollan <mlm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Ulf Volmer wrote:
>On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:

>>When I enable stp:
>>
>> [root@localhost ~]# brctl show br0
>> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
>> br0             8000.080027a398e6       yes             enp0s3
>>                                                          enp0s8
>
>As Gordon said, i recommend to remove one of the physical interfaces from the
>bridge.

There should be no need to do that ... that is after all the purpose of 
STP (in effect, what STP would do is prevent one link from being used by 
putting it into blocking state leaving the other in forwarding state).  
Nominally one would prefer bonding (AKA trunking or a LAG) where both 
can be actively used.


/mark
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos