Re: Rsync and differential Backups

[Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2015-11-10, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm fully with you on -o inode64, but I would think it is not inode number
> that becomes large with extensive use of hard links, but the space used by
> directory data, thus requiring to relocate these once they exceed some
> size so ultimately some of them will be pushed beyond 1 TB border
> (depending on how the filesystem is used). Someone, correct me if I'm
> wrong.

Does this answer the question you're asking?  I think so but I'm not
sure.

http://www.xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_is_the_inode64_mount_option_for.3F

--keith

-- 
kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos