On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:59:14PM -0500, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > The answer is that the large exported filesystem is a very large XFS... > and at least through CentOS 6, upstream has *never* fixed an NFS bug that > I find, googling, being complained about in '09: it gags on inodes > 32bit > (not sure if that's signed, or unsigned, but....). Out of curiosity, was this a 32-bit or 64-bit CentOS6 system? -- Jonathan Billings <billings@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- From: Jonathan Billings <billings@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:30:26 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <40911271993456fa60898e406a0b692f.squirrel@host290.hostmonster.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2015-06-09)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- From: m . roth
- Re: stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- References:
- stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- From: m . roth
- stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- Prev by Date: stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- Next by Date: Re: stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- Previous by thread: stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- Next by thread: Re: stale file handle issue [SOLVED]
- Index(es):
 |