Re: Semi-OT: fail2ban issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



In article <1446132814771.22431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Eriksson, Thomas <thomas.eriksson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This should probably be a bug report for the fail2ban EPEL maintainer, the problem was introduced in version 0.9.3
> 
> >From the file /etc/fail2ban/action.d/iptables-common.conf
> ...
> # Option:  lockingopt
> # Notes.:  Option was introduced to iptables to prevent multiple instances from
> #          running concurrently and causing irratic behavior.  -w was introduced
> #          in iptables 1.4.20, so might be absent on older systems
> #          See https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/1122
> # Values:  STRING
> lockingopt = -w
> ...
> 
> Now, CentOS 6.7 has iptables 1.4.7 and the "wait" option does not seem to have been backported by RedHat, so the EPEL package for EL6 should probably not have this as the default.
> 
> My workaround was to create a file /etc/fail2ban/action.d/iptables-common.local that contains
> ...
> [Init]
> lockingopt =
> ...

Looks like it has been fixed in the update fail2ban-0.9.3-1.el6.1

Cheers
Tony
-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - http://tony.mountifield.org
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux