On 10/23/2015 03:44 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> James B. Byrne wrote: >>>> >>>> I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been >>>> rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I >>>> must reboot my servers. I wondered whether this was simply a >>>> misconception on my part or an actual change in the environment. >>>> >>>> Apparently it is the later. >>> >>> So systemd moves Linux to more resemble Windows? >> >> No. If anything, systemd handles upgrades better than SysV init, since it >> handles re-execing better. Please stop spreading FUD. > <snip> > What FUD? It adds *binary* logfiles, readable only with a separate > program; when I restart a service, it does not *tell* me what's going on, > just worked or didn't, so I don't know, if it fails, where, the messages > from journalctl are extremely unhelpful, and when it boots, if I want to > watch, it tends to hide much info. It's much less informative in most ways > in helping me solve problems. > Jesus Christ .. do we really have to start ANOTHER systemd thread. For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7. CentOS-7 contains systemd and where ever Red Hat puts it, CentOS will rebuild the source code. If people don't like the distro, then use something else. These lists are for providing USEFUL information to CentOS users .. flame threads will result in list users who are moderated.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
