On 10/20/2015 01:28 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:29:06PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> Those 3 addresses are good, the 204.15.73.243 is incorrect. > > 204.15.73.243 reverse resolves to centos.at.multacom.com. > multacom is a CentOS Sponsor according to: > https://www.centos.org/sponsors/ > > An outdated config somewhere? > I don't think so on our end, but that was at one time a good address. Maybe the site in question has a static address added in a hosts file, etc.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos