As I understand their fallback that is the design idea — they each hand out diverse ranges…
On Sep 23, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anybody have any experience with setting up dhcpd in failover mode
> between two servers? I set this up on a couple of servers, and it seems
> to be working, but I don't think it is working "right". It appears both
> servers are replying to all requests (which for renewals works okay
> because they both give the same address, but new requests get two
> different responses). I thought that only one server would reply to a
> particular request.
>
> Also, every DHCPACK is followed by a message like this in the log:
>
> Sep 23 15:45:50 rad2 dhcpd: bind update on x.x.x.x from mypeer rejected: incoming update is less critical than outgoing update
>
> Any ideas? I subscribed and asked over on the ISC-operated dhcp-users
> list but haven't had any responses. Google finds others asking about
> the same log message, and the only responses seem to be "well, if you
> get it for every update, there's probably some configuration issue" (but
> nobody ever says what issue might lead to it).
>
> --
> Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
