Re: OOM and Swappiness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 09/16/2015 09:11 AM, Callum Scott wrote:
>> It is running a little
>> tight on memory and so there have been a couple of events where the
>> OOM_killer has been invoked and killed off MySQL, which you would
>> expect.
>
> One thing that should be noted is that regardless of swappiness,
> overcommit might be an issue.  If a single process is using most of the
> memory in a system, and attempts to fork(), as it will if it calls
> system(), then the system may require that there is enough memory for a
> second instance of that huge process.
>
> This is one of the reasons why swap should be as large or larger than
> system RAM.
<snip>
Excerpt on heavy-duty servers. We're certainly not going to allocate
hundreds of gigs, or a terabyte or so, for swap. (Yes, we do have servers
with that kind of RAM, and that's not counting the small SGI
supercomputer....)

          mark

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux