Hello,
On 11 September 2015 at 14:04, Dario Lesca <d.lesca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha scritto:
> > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> > ...
> > >
> > > Hi James, thanks for reply. It seems as at SerNet's site have
> > > packages
> > > for RHEL6/Centos6 only, not for RHEL7/Centos7 or any Fedora
> > > versions,
> > > at least this.
> > >
> >
> > Indeed but fortunately EL6 has many years ahead of it yet.
> >
> > > Regarding to Samba4 with MIT in 4.2/4.3 - as I know, 4.2 still is
> > > not
> > > even in rc, thus final release can be perhaps at the turn of the
> > > year.
> >
> > The rc is due Sep 15th last I heard.
> >
> > > And when time between releases is approx. 9 month, then we can wait
> > > around
> > > for year...
> > > I'll keep my fingers crossed, that it happen in 4.2
> >
> > Andrew Bartlett has expressed an opinion on the samba technical list
> > that he'd be in favour of a very short 4.2 cycle if it means getting
> > these sort of updates out.
>
> There is some news for this tread?
>
> Samba 4.3 is out:
> https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.3.0.html
>
> and into Fedora Development there's already new package:
>
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/s/
>
> But the "samba-ad" package still missing.
>
> Someone have more info?
>
> Many thanks
>
>
It is a decision of red hat over MIT or Heimdal. Red hat chooses MIT and
Samba 4 AD chooses Heimdal.
You have more info in https://access.redhat.com/discussions/1235263
Regards,
--
Oscar Osta Pueyo
oostap.listas@xxxxxxxxx
_kiakli_
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
