Johnny Hughes wrote:
>On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 22:08 +1000, Bards1888 wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed
>>with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN
>>in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc.
>>I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it.
>>
>>
>
>I have removed items after install and gotten down to about 550 mb on a
>CentOS-4 install.
>
>
>
>>That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ?
>>
>>
>>
>
>Yes, we are working on trimming it to fit on a 700mb disc and to have
>the same packages for x86_64 and i386.
>
>
>
>>The other thing I noticed is that if I install on x86_64 I get around
>>400mb in /usr/lib *and* /usr/lib64, is this entirely necessary ?
>>Especially if I dont want the 32bit stuff ? How can one tell which
>>packages are responsible for the libs in /usr/lib/ ? I tried a random
>>filem from that directory;
>>
>>[root@services lib]# rpm -q --whatprovides libOggFLAC.so.1
>>flac-1.1.0-7
>>[root@services lib]# rpm -qa | grep -i flac
>>flac-1.1.0-7
>>[root@services lib]# rpm -qi flac-1.1.0-7
>>Name : flac Relocations: (not relocatable)
>>Version : 1.1.0 Vendor: CentOS
>>Release : 7 Build Date: Tue 22 Feb 2005
>>10:56:45 EST
>>Install Date: Wed 13 Apr 2005 11:50:50 EST Build Host:
>>guru.build.karan.org
>>Group : Applications/Multimedia Source RPM: flac-1.1.0-7.src.rpm
>>Size : 707386 License: LGPL/GPL
>>Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sun 27 Feb 2005 06:37:33 EST, Key ID
>>a53d0bab443e1821
>>Packager : Karanbir Singh <kbsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>URL : http://flac.sourceforge.net/
>>Summary : An encoder/decoder for the Free Lossless Audio Codec.
>>Description :
>>FLAC stands for Free Lossless Audio Codec. Grossly oversimplified, FLAC
>>is similar to Ogg Vorbis, but lossless. The FLAC project consists of
>>the stream format, reference encoders and decoders in library form,
>>flac, a command-line program to encode and decode FLAC files, metaflac,
>>a command-line metadata editor for FLAC files and input plugins for
>>various music players (the xmms plugin is in a sub-package).
>>
>>
>>I cant see an 'arch' in there anywhere, however on the Centos DVD I
>>found flac for both i386 and x86_64.
>>
>>
>>
>you need to add this line to the .rpmmacros for the user that you want
>to see both arches for:
>
>%_query_all_fmt %%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}
>
>
>
>>So why are there rpms for both archs with the x86_64 build ?
>>
>>
>>
>
>because that is how the upstream provider releases it .. and we follow
>suit.
>
>The real reason is so that people can have things like openoffice.org
>and festival and plugins for mozilla, etc ... these do not build in
>x86_64 mode.
>
>You can run both i386 and x86_64 stuff on the x86_64.
>
>once you make the above change to .rpmmacros, you can do:
>
>rpm -qa | grep i386
>(to see i386 packages)
>
>and
>
>rpm -e `rpm -qa | grep i386`
>(to remove i386 packages)
>
>when installing via yum, if you want to ensure only the x86_64 package
>gets installed, do:
>
>yum install iptraf.x86_64
>
>and NOT
>
>yum install iptraf
>
>(just an example)
>
>
>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>_______________________________________________
>>CentOS mailing list
>>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CentOS mailing list
>>CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>>
As usual Johnny, you are a gentleman. Thanks for your help.
550mb sounds great. Was that minus X, development (gcc et al) ?
Is there any way at install time to ensure that no i386 packages are
installed ?
Thanks again.
Bards.
