Re: /boot on a separate partition?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On 6/26/2015 12:38 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
At Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:58:07 -0400 CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:27:47PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
It's bad design. First, it's a nested mount: file system A on /, and
file system B on /boot, and file system C on /boot/efi. Therefore the
mount process must make sure they're mounted in that order, or there's
failure.
I've never once had a problem with nested mounts.  Is this a problem
people have?  First I've heard of it.
'mount -av' has *long* supported nested mounts.  Nested mounts are a 'trick'
from the days of UNIX from way back when.  Mount knows all about going through
/etc/fatab and coming up with a sane and correct order for mounting file
systems.


The only issue I have ever had is if / is not listed first. For some reason that I cannot remember I once listed /boot first in /etc/fstab and the system could not remount / as RW as the first thing mount did was mount /boot. Apparently it failed to recognize / needed a remount before mounting anything else.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux