On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 22:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Just for the record, we are currently working with someone from SGI to
> get a much better implementation of XFS working with the centosplus
> kernel.
>
> I want to wait to push the centosplus unsupported kernel (2.6.9-22)
> until we have this new and much more stable version of XFS code
> implemented.
Any chance of a really-really-unsupported kernel as in the latest
fedora 2.6.13.x rebuilt for Centos? I'm beginning to think that
fireware disk support might finally be reliable there. Or maybe
a backport of whatever has been done to the ohci1394, ieee1394, and
sbp2 modules?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
