Re: AutoFS mystery ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ok, I think I discovered an issue. It may be a "feature" but this is what
has bitten me now. After making the above fixes with the proper paths, it
still wasn't working. When I do an smbclient query, it gave me all the
details indicating the share is there and available. however, autofs was
still failing. When I tried a manual mount on the client, I would get:

$ mount -t cifs //bigrip/trex /mnt/trex -o user=guest
Retrying with upper case share name
mount error(6): No such device or address
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs)

And on the server side I see this:
CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -6

On a hunch, I decided to make a small change on the server side. The samba
configuration is set up with a server name and several aliases for the
various shares, so the staff here can go to \\<server-name>\<path> and
\\<server-alias>\<path> and have different access control, different files,
and all that fun, but it's all on the same physical machine. The path I was
trying to mount is on one of those aliases. So I made that change on the
server, exporting the share on the real server name and now suddenly it's
working. I can mount it with no problems, and autofs is working. When I
switched it back to using the server alias, it fails.

Interestingly, the Windows clients mounting this share, using the server
alias, are working just fine. But for some reason that does not work when I
try it from a CentOS machine.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux