Care to explain those two. direct versus indirect mapping?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Nope, that completely takes over '/mnt' and everything else that's in
> there
> > becomes invisible. However, I do believe you're on to something here.
> > Looking back at the other, working setup, I do realize now that I did the
> > same, where the path was '/mnt/<something>' and the autofs mounts are
> > within that, so they became '/mnt/<something>/<mount-point>' - so thanks
> > for that hint. I'll go fiddle with it.
>
> Right, I use something other than /mnt for my autofs.
>
> Another thing you may want to consider is use of 'direct map' instead
> of 'indirect map'. If I remember correctly, it works well with cifs
> mounts, too.
>
> Akemi
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
