Re: rpmforge vs epel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 6/9/2015 11:26 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do
not play well together and that if I use both,
epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority.
Alas I had it the other way around.
rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity.
I no longer need audacity,
but would like to fix the situation before some other problem crops up.

Would fixing the priorities and telling yum to
reinstall all the packages from rpmforge be useful?
Would it be dangerous?


as rpmforge is virtually unmaintained now, I would enumerate all the .rf. packages you currently have, ascertain if you can get them from better supported repos, starting with epel, and if so, remove said .rf. package and install the epel or nux or whatever equivalents in their place. this may very well require some tinkering with package specific configurations on your part.



--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux