Re: Native ZFS on Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Could you explain why you did not reply to the mail fropm Chris Adams who 
> > introduced a false claim about so called "opinions of a number of lawyers"?
> > 
> > As mentioned: lawyers explain why there is no problem with ZFS integration. If 
> > you don't like useless discussions, you need to prevent people from spreading 
> > unverified rumors.
> > 
> > Jörg
> > 
>
> I replied to the last one I saw in the thread at the time of my reply ..
> not to assign blame.

OK, plese note that I am not willing to tolerate anti-oss claims and will 
continue to correct similar false claims. If you don't like those discussions 
at all, you should try to avoid false claims and the need for corrections.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxx                    (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux