Re: Gcc issue on C7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:41:19PM -0400, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Fred Smith wrote:
> > I apologize up front, I'm sure this isn't the right place to ask, but
> > I'm not sure where I should ask, instead. Hoping for some helpful hints
> > in that regard...
> >
> > I'm using (trying to use...) the -fsanitize=thread feature. Though I'm
> > finding the diagnostics rather cryptic, that isn't my issue here.
> > Suddenly, a few days ago, I started getting this error while running the
> > app i'm testing:
> <snip>
> > [New Thread 0x7fcd2f9ea700 (LWP 8152)]
> > [New Thread 0x7fcd2f1e9700 (LWP 8153)]
> > ThreadSanitizer: longjmp() is not supported
> <snip>
> > [Thread 0x7fcd47858700 (LWP 8141) exited]
> >
> > The message about longjmp() is the issue. This app doesn't use longjmp
> > or siglongjump or any other of its cousins. It's possible that some
> > 3rd-party lib (Oracle??) might, but I don't know why it has been working
> for several
> > weeks and suddenly starts giving me this error...
> >
> > Clues welcome, thanks!
> 
> Many years ago, a couple young consultants came to me where we were
> working (I was the "senior technical resource"), and told me the program
> kept crashing in a library. We ran it under the debugger, and we saw the
> library call. We reran it, with me at the keyboard, and I did something
> they had no idea about: I stepped *into* the call, (the old Sun debugger,
> stepi, rather than step, or stepn). I continued to step, working my way
> down, finding the calls it crashed in. Finally, I found the function that
> was crashing, stepped into it - turned out to be a BEA Tuxedo call - and
> then I, who had the authority, could call them, and even though it was
> stripped... I could tell them the function it failed in, and more-or-less
> what it seemed to be doing. 'Bout a day later, I got a message back from
> the developers what the issue was.
> 
> You might try finding your problem that way; then you might have a clue as
> to how to resolve it.
> 
> Oh, and if it's Oracle, don't forget to set TWO_TASK, I think it was
> called (haven't used Pro*C more than a dozen years....)

I'm not using Pro*C either. I recall reading about TWO_TASK some years
ago but never did figure out how to use it in a non-PRO*C environment, or
even if it would be of value. Figured out, with a LOT of pain, how to use
OCI to do what I needed.


-- 
---- Fred Smith -- fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----------------------------
   "For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged 
   sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; 
              it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart."  
---------------------------- Hebrews 4:12 (niv) ------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux