Ulrich Hiller wrote: > that's intersting. "performing access check" is really missing. > > also the "sdap_access" lines are not there. Therefore i do have: > > (Tue May 12 13:16:20 2015) [sssd[be[default]]] [dp_get_options] > (0x0400): Option ldap_access_filter has no value > (Tue May 12 13:16:20 2015) [sssd[be[default]]] [dp_get_options] > (0x0400): Option ldap_access_order has value host > (Tue May 12 13:16:20 2015) [sssd[be[default]]] [be_process_init] > (0x2000): ACCESS backend target successfully loaded from provider [ldap]. <snip> I really don't know this level, but from the above, my first reaction is to see if there has to be an ldab_access_filter that then leads to the ldap_access_order in the chain. mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos