On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included
>>> in the anaconda install. For example where the saved anaconda-ks-cfg
>>> shows @gnome-desktop and @development, 'yum grouplist' only shows
>>> 'MATE Desktop' which was installed later.
>>
>> Does the "hidden" flag help here?
>
> Well it's different, but still doesn't seem right. That shows:
> Installed environment groups:
> MATE Desktop
> and
> Installed groups:
> Core
> Dial-up Networking Support
> Fonts
> Guest Desktop Agents
> Input Methods
> MATE
> Multimedia
> but still no mention of development or gnome.
>
And I guess the other piece of this would be finding individual
packages that are not encompassed by the groups - or pulled in by
dependencies. Is there some database-like approach to take the full
list of packages, then reduce it to the minimal list of groups and
top-level packages to pull the rest in? It probably will work to
hand the raw list to yum but I'd like to make an understandable list
in a script even if the packages had been added piecemeal in the first
place as someone noticed the need for them.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
