More than 1 gcc version?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If your code conforms to ANSI, file a bug with gcc folks. 
> If it doesn't conform with ANSI, it's you who are at fault.

> Don't blame the compiler for your mistakes of the past.

This "fault" thing has gotta go.

Because, ultimately, it was GCC 2 that was "at fault" when it
came to ANSI C++ (let alone some ANSI C).  But GCC 2 had a
lot of legacy behind it, much of which _pre-dated_ ANSI C++
standardization.  So where does the finger-pointing end?

In the end, as of GCC 3, the world is a lot better.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith                | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx     |  (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ |   missing headers)

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux