Re: Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts

[Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> oh fun, just did some tests (using c6.latest).   if you're in bash, 
> ./script (sans shebang) runs it in bash.  if you're in dash or csh, 
> ./script runs it in sh.    if you're in ksh, it runs it in ksh.

See my other mail.

The scripts (unless marked) are run by the current interpreter. Csh
runs unmarked scripts by "sh".

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxx                    (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos