Re: Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/24/15 05:59, Les Mikesell wrote:
The original ksh wasn't open source and might even have been an
extra-cost item in AT&T unix.   And the early emulations weren't
always complete so you couldn't count on script portability.  I
generally thought it was safer to use perl for anything that took more
than bourne shell syntax.

You're right about the extra cost. In 1989 I bought the ksh source code from AT&T for $100.

Jack

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux