On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 10:16 +0200, Tim wrote:
> I think, this SIG would/should care about hardening CentOS itself as a system not a complete environment (proxies, firewalls, etc.)
> The examples of the opener show this.
>
> Something else could be integrity checking possibly.
>
> I imagine a tool/script that could apply hardening stuff.
>
> Regards
> Tim
>
> Am 22. April 2015 09:23:52 MESZ, schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@xxxxxx>:
> >Sounds like a bit basic stuff? How about hardening ciphers, two factor
> >authentication, snort, web application firewall and scap scanning?
> >
> >Eero
> >22.4.2015 10.14 ap. "Andrew Holway" <andrew.holway@xxxxxxxxx>
> >kirjoitti:
> >
> >> SELinux?
> >>
> >> On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> apply also ideas from this document:
> >> >>
> >https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the
> >things you
> >> > mentioned are discussed in the CIS benchmarks.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks for all of your input guys, there were some discussion on the
centos-devel list [0], which will give you a better idea of what this
SIG will aim to accomplish.
We will be happy to see you guys over on the centos-devel list and if
possible chip in to make this SIG a success.
[0]
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-April/013280.html
--
Earl A Ramirez <earlaramirez@xxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
