From: John R Pierce Sent: April 20, 2015 23:58 > On 4/20/2015 9:08 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote: > > The second idea was to set each filesystem to a different > random count > > value. This would run the risk of having two or more executions at > > the same time but it would probably not be very frequent. > > > > Does anyone have a suggestion for a better way of doing this? > > use XFS, no fsck's until/unless something catastrophic happens to the > file system. Thanks. That would avoid the problem on future systems. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos