On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote:
>
>
> BUT .. If I was going to solve this problem, I would do so asking the
> sernet guys and I would rebuild the "bind" sources in CentOS with the
> proper configure switches so it would likely still meet all the other
> software requires for CentOS that bind needs to meet. You could also
> then only track when CentOS releases a new bind (because RH has released
> new source code) .. and thereby not have to track bind upstream tarball
> releases for security.
>
>
>
Sounds like good advice for me to follow up on.
Thanks for the thoughtful response. :-)
Mike
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
