On 2015-04-14 11:44, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2015-04-14 21:40 GMT+03:00 Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
http://serverfault.com/a/655752/24406
If that is accurate, the documentation, and the clustering / load
balancing might tilt the balance in the direction of strongSwan.
Well, both packages can do ipsec to cisco asa without any problems.
I have this one case where the other end of the connection wants to use
some specific encryption parameters (specific versions of AES and SHA).
I need to make sure that whatever software I use, is capable of
providing that. Better documentation will certainly help.
And of course, a more actively supported project, with a good security
track record, is very important.
All these are factors in choosing between Openswan / Libreswan /
strongSwan.
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
