On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/01/2015 11:45 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
This was discussed on the CentOS-Devel mailing list and approved by the
CentOS Board. It is what we are using in the future. I suggest you
become familiar with it.
Obviously naming conventions should provide for an easy upstream vendor
version reference?
does /etc/centos-release-upstream provide you with that ?
/etc/centos-release-upstream is not useful when looking at an iso name.
With 7.0 the iso name was CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso. With 7.1 the
iso name is CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503-01.iso. Since you dropped the minor
version in the iso name and assuming that you are not going to put it
back in the future, going forward I will need a chart to figure out what
upstream version an iso corresponds to.
How is that better?
Regards,
--
Tom me@xxxxxxxxxx Spamtrap address me123@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
