On 03/31/2015 04:24 PM, Alain Péan wrote: > Le 31/03/2015 20:30, Johnny Hughes a écrit : >>> I would have assumed that this release would be "7.1.1503", and the URL >>> >>on at least one mirror has: >>> >> >>> >>http://mirror.fdcservers.net/centos/7.1.1503/ >>> >> >>> >>Guess if that's the new convention, I'll need to keep my ISO files >>> >>sorted out somehow, as this progression isn't intuitive: >>> >> >>> >>CentOS-7.0-1406-x86_64-DVD.iso >>> >>CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso >> > >> >Please take a look at the "Archived Versions", and the Release >> Announcement: >> > >> >They both tell you that 7 (1503) is derived from Red Hat Enterprise >> >Linux 7.1 Sources. So, yes, this release, that you quoted in the >> >Subject, is indeed exactly what you said. > > It seems that also the redhat-release file has changed.Previously, it was : > [root@centos7 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > CentOS Linux release 7.0.1406 (Core) > > Now it is : > [root@centos-test ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release > Derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.1 (Source) > > It is also my opinion that the name CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1503.iso is > rather confusing, it is not immediately evident that it is release 7.1. > I would have prefered the name CentOS-7.1-1503-x86_64-DVD.iso, following > the previous name convention. Well, we are now using a new naming convention .. although, we have update /etc/cetnos-release/ This naming convention was voted on by the CentOS Board and discussed on the CentOS-Devel mailing list. It is what we are using moving forward. Please become familiar with it,as we do not expect to change it again.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
