On 24/03/2015 18:54, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:56:27 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
Doesn't anyone have a list of the oldest
kernel version for each Centos version you could be running and still
avoid known problems?
The best answer to your question is "the latest version", since previous versions all have known issues of one kind or another.
It's not a great idea to run outdated Centos systems with known bugs of any kind.
I can't argue with that (then again, you were running that buggy code
before and happy with it), but having to reboot frequently is not
ideal either, particularly on machines where scheduling downtime is a
fairly involved process. I'm looking for the compromise with the
least pain involved.
Hi Les,
https://access.redhat.com/labs/leapsecond/leap_vulnerability.sh
If you don't have a subscription then the key bits from the script are:
# RHEL 4 needs to be after -89
# RHEL 5 needs to be after -164
# RHEL 6 Affected Versions
# 6 GA: All Versions
# 6.1: Versions before -131.30.2
# 6.2: Versions before -220.25.1
# 6.3: Versions before -279.5.2
and that the tzdata should be from 2015
Tris
*************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email
in error please notify postmaster@xxxxxxxx
The views expressed within this email are those of the
individual, and not necessarily those of the organisation
*************************************************************
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
