On Tue, February 10, 2015 7:36 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 19:19 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>
>> Just to make it clear: I recommended the book itself without pointing to
>> any source of it, and when pirate copy was mentioned by somebody else, I
>> had to say I do not recommend that source and would recommend to buy the
>> book on amazon.
Indeed I should have said "allegedly pirated" not just "pirated". As I
don't care to go into details if it is or it isn't. I also would recommend
to finish this discussion and those who feel so get themselves some
fundamental book and go ahead with reading it. Which I'm going to do
myself (there are things I need to read...)
Valeri
>
> The person asserting the copy was "pirated" (meaning stolen) has no
> proof it was stolen. Just because someone jumps up and down shouting
> various things, can not in law make any of those things a fact.
>
> To prove something one needs FACTS which is also known as evidence. No
> evidence exists that the copy was stolen. Justice depends on factual
> information not people inventing "facts" without proof. If I claimed
> you were Bill Gates' brother, would that actually make you Bill Gates'
> brother ?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Paul.
> England, EU. Je suis Charlie.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
