Le 10/02/2015 15:35, Niki Kovacs a écrit :
So far, no way to bring either eth0 or eth1 up. What am I doing wrong here? Is NetworkManager now a mandatory part of the base system? Some other mistake somewhere else? I'm a bit puzzled here.
I'll answer that myself, after some more experimenting. Apparently, reverting to the traditional ethX interface naming scheme creates some unexpected behavior. I decided to keep the new persistent naming scheme (enp2s0 and enp3s1 on my server), and from there, everything works like expected.
Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
