Re: Another Fedora decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 02/09/2015 11:11 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> On 10 February 2015 at 16:39, Pete Travis <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Officially, no, the "Fedora Documentation" bz product isn't there for
>> Red Hat guides.  If you want to file a bug against a RHEL guide, choose
>> your version of RHEL then look for the guide's component - these days,
>> they all start with "doc-", which should make the search easy.
>
> Thanks for the heads up. Was not aware of the 'doc-' prefix.
>
>> Unofficially, there's a nonzero chance that your bug will find a writer
>> that plays in both spaces, or that we'll be able reassign the bug to the
>> correct component for you.  But please, don't make work for Fedora
>> volunteers when there are people standing by getting paid to handle your
>> bugs :)
>
> As previously noted, the authors of both documents are the same, and
> appear to be RedHat employees.
> _______________________________________________
>

Right, that's the non-zero thing I mentioned. Some Red Hat writers also
contribute to Fedora Docs, often on their own time.

-- 
-- Pete

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux