Re: Another Fedora decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 20:44:33 +0000, Always Learning wrote:
	[....]
> There should be a basic defence that when the password is wrong 'n'
> occasions the IP address is blocked automatically and permanently unless
> it is specifically allowed in IP Tables. If specifically allowed in IP
> Tables, there should be a predetermined wait time before another attempt
> can be made.
> 
> Simple !  So why does Fedora prefer allowing the hackers unlimited
> opportunities to brute-force passwords ?

	Both denyhosts and fail2ban can be installed from yum or dnf; is 
the same then not true for CentOS?? It worked on my wife's machine. (I'm 
presently fighting a strike by the box on which I normally run CentOS on 
my desk in order to be familiar with her OS.) Maybe I have some repo set 
for it that you don't??

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power User
Remember I know little (precious little!) of where up is.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux