Re: Another Fedora decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 02/06/2015 12:50 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
On 6 February 2015 at 10:23, Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Logically ?

1. to change the permissions on shadow from -rw-x------ or from
---------- to -rw-r--r-- requires root permissions ?

2. if so, then what is the advantage of changing those permissions when
the entity possessing root authority can already read shadow - that
entity requires neither group nor user permissions to read shadow.

The concept in play here is privilege escalation.

An exploit may not give you all that root can do, but may be limited
to, say, tricking the system to change file permission.
 From there an attacker could use that and other exploits to escalate privileges.

come on guys, If a cracker changed the perms to 644 he's probably sensible enough to change it back to 000 after grabbing a copy...
this is most likely a BCAK error, let it rest please.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux