Re: Another Fedora decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Valeri Galtsev wrote:

>> What secret motive *could* there be??  The current security policy is
>> weak, and this change fixes that.  End of story.
> 
> It's hard to not endorse everything you are saying. As far as motive is
> concerned, it is not that secret. Security. RedHat doesn't like poorly
> administered machined with RHEL linux get hacked, then many voices saying
> saying in the internet: RHEL Linux is not secure, RHEL Linux machines are
> getting hacked. Even though the reason is not what it sounds like.

While I admire RedHat, and use CentOS on my home servers,
I would expect RH to give priority to those paying for their services,
who I imagine are almost all sysadmins of systems with many users.
My interests as a tiny user may not coincide with theirs.

This does not mean that I think there are evil spirits at RH
trying to disrupt my life.
But it does mean that the inconvenience of strong passwords
may outweigh any additional security in my case.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux