Re: Another Fedora decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 19:03 -0800, Keith Keller wrote:

> On 2015-02-03, Always Learning <centos@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps a topic for the Centos Wiki entitled Basic Security on Your New
> > Machine ?
> 
> As long as someone qualified is writing and reviewing this wiki page.

Disagree. One does not have to posses some mythical qualifications, or
any qualification at all, to write a sensible guide.  What is required
is knowledge, experience, clarity of thought and expression and a desire
and ability to pass-on one's knowledge to others in a very
understandable manner.

Peer review is obviously beneficial. 

Placing obstacles in the way perhaps explains why this topic may not
have been sufficient covered by the Centos wiki.  Just look at what the
"Qualified" have produced so far on this topic !  Why does one need to
be "qualified" by a third party before one can write a good, concise and
very informative guide ?

I think it better if the peer reviewer/reviewers is/are distinct from
the author(s). Reviewing one's own work is often prone to inadvertently
overlooking one's own mistakes. 

It can be a collaborative effort. 


-- 
Regards,

Paul.
England, EU.      Je suis Charlie.


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux