Re: Design changes are done in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat if
I
look back). One day I realized how happy I am that I chose RedHat way
back, - that was when all Debian (and its clones like Ubuntu,...) admins
were fighting with the consequences of this:
http://www.debian.org/security/2008/dsa-1571 . If I had Debian machine I
would not only regenerate all key pairs, certs, etc. I would question
sanity of that box then, and will not be certain what confidential stuff
could have been stolen from it... I realized then that that level big
flop
never happened to RedHat. I couldn't even point to something that would
constitute big flop RedHat of then. One only criticizes something while
one cares about it ;-)
Heartbleed was pretty scary, no?  I'd consider that at least as bad as
the predictable number generator issue.

Well, heratbleed and shellshock were pretty much global: all systems (not
only Linuxes, not to say particular Linux distributions - my FreeBSD boxes
were affected too) using openssl or bash were affected... Same bad, yet
these were not flops of particular distribution, so whichever system you
decided to stick with , you had these. Not certain about you, but this
kind of makes difference for me. When I say I'm happy about [me choosing
way back] RedHat heartbleed, no heartbleed, no difference.

Valeri

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Valeri Galtsev
Sr System Administrator
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Phone: 773-702-4247
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I guess everyone will have an opinion of systemd whether it be good or bad. The only resolution is to either use a distro that has systemd on it, use a distro that DOESN'T have systemd on it...or build your OWN distro and don't include systemd! I guess when it all boils down to it, there's STILL choice.....even when it doesn't seem like there is!


EGO II
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux